Data Info

Preparing For Serendipity A Crucial Knowledge Work Skill

Before I begin todays blogpost, I have to mention the biggest event in Indian cricketing history over the last three decades or so. India won the 2011 Cricket World Cup on Saturday and what a win it was! The eleven played like true champions against a tough opposition and at the end of it came out on top. For my non-Indian readers heres a moment for you to accidentally discover how big a deal this is in India. People actually took to the streets in celebration. If you bump into me over the next few days, youre likely to hear me talk about this win so bear with me please.

Speaking of accidental discovery brings me to what I want to write about today. Were uncomfortable with accidents and uncertainty. That being said, a lot of social media based learning solutions rely on serendipity and chance discovery. Serendipity is quite a counterintuitive phenomenon. How do you know that youll know the important stuff? Most of us from the 70s and the 80s have grown up on a diet of structured media, whether through the web or through books, magazines and education. New media on the other hand accelerates content creation in such a big way that traditional structure is destined to fall behind. A week or so back I wrote an article about the shape of knowledge management in the age of social media. Today I want to talk about the personal mindset that each knowledge worker needs to really exploit this rich, diverse, yet often confusing information explosion.

We ask for structure, but do we really need it?
Its amazing that when on company intranets, people expect structure whereas when on the internet, people dont even imagine browsing. Its no surprise that several people actually use Google as their homepage or as a means to start navigating the web. Why then, is search a counter-intuitive beginning to peoples intranet experience. Granted that most intranet searches are just bad, but lets assume you could be confident that the information youre looking for exists, and theres a good search that can find stuff. People still find it tough to start with search. I believe theres a reason for this. Traditionally, company intranets had finite amounts of information. Its easy to build a taxonomy around this finite information and organise it in a browseable sitemap. With modern social intranets content creation explodes in such a big way that its a bit foolish to even attempt structures. The only structures that survive are the ones that emerge ground up through metadata. Social media does its bit to help search on the internet as well. Whether we like it or not we constantly keep accidentally discovering stuff on the internet, through various social networks. The constant discoveries help us know in our subconscious mind that we can actually find something if we tried.

Dont drink from a firehose, just sit by a stream

"Its a river of information, dip your foot in whenever its convenient." - Leo Laporte

The fact is that with modern social networks, serendipity is a knowledge guarantee but it needs mental preparation. It may seem that if someone provides you packaged, neatly organised content then youll be happy, but the reality is quite the contrary. Lets forget about social media for a while. Regardless of how avid a news reader you are, its perhaps tough for you to keep up with all the news in the world. Depending on the kind of news youre interested in, you perhaps customise your news intake. Not many people read the entire newspaper. Think of a time when you missed an important piece of news. Not many people really sweat over this, because if the news is really important, someone will tell you about it. Social media is quite like news. As Laporte says, its a river of information. When you sit by a river, you dont try to drink all the water thats flowing by. You dip in your toe when it makes sense for you. But then what if you miss something? This is where you handle your learning just the way you handle news. If its important, your connections will tell you. This is where having personal learning network (PLN) that you can trust, makes sense.

Its not information overload, its filter failure
Clay Shirky said a few years back, "Its no information overload, its filter failure." If the current information explosion was really a bad thing then the converse, an absolute lack of information, would make us happy, wouldnt it? Now that seems odd - I guess no one would be happy with that. Shirkys right then - the filters are crucial. As I explained in my last article, were so individualistic these days that another persons organisation of content hardly ever makes sense to us. On the other hand if we have right filters, we can create a structure that makes sense to us and is tailored to our needs. And by the way, sometimes the best filter is another person on your PLN who you can trust. Just as we trust our friends to remind us of important news weve missed, we leverage our PLN to find the the learning thats important.

If you still need structure, the tools are out there
Once you know what filters make sense for you, there are several tools and services that can create meaningful structure around that filter. My latest favourite is Flipboard on the iPad (see screenshot above) though apps like Zite are worthy competitors. The truth is that you dont need a fancy iPad to provide you the right kind of organisation. Web services like paper.li can help you create really nice, structure around important information. Google Reader can give you some really interesting visualisation around your RSS feeds. Heck, there are thousands of applications and services just around Twitter. The key is to pick the services you care for, decide on the filters that make sense to you and follow the people that really matter. From that point you just need to trust that the important information will come to you. Just believe!

---

Ever since Jay Cross wrote his book on Informal Learning, several people have spoken about the need to formalise informal learning. I think thats just absolute rubbish. Informal learning benefits from the natural connections amongst people and the serendipity it fosters. "Formal informal learning" is the biggest oxymoron on the planet, Im sorry! In my view the fact is that if you cant prepare for serendipity, youre not ready for the 21st century workplace. Structure makes sense when youre dealing with a finite amount of information. The only way through constantly growing information sources, is to be able to develop the skills of personal knowledge management and sense making. If I was hiring someone today, this would be a primary skill Id look for.
(Technorati claim: FRCHU6AEKYFN)

Available link for download

Please HELP! Trouser Fitting Knowledge Required

So I kind of ear-marked the second half of 2015 for nailing trouser making and fitting. I cant help but notice that June is on its way out, so its time to get schooled. The thing is, I dont just want to make a couple of passable/wearable pairs for myself; ideally Id like to go deep so I can really understand them to help other people with fit and figure issues that may be different to my own. Sewing bloggers of the world, PUH-LEASE can you direct me towards some knowledge?! I want to know everything, but in the meantime these are my specific areas of confusion:


The Long and Short of it 

When making for myself, Ive realised that theres one pattern alterations I will definitely need to make. My main fit issue seems to be my shortwaisted-ness (my natural waist line is a bit higher up than average). To accommodate that I know I need to slash and spread the front and back trouser pattern pieces like this, but how much to spread? Presumably Id need to know my rise measurement, however an evening (well, hour or so, I dont get much time to myself these days!) spent on Google and YouTube failed to unearth an accurate method to do so. Any ideas?

All Rise

Also, how do you know what rise shape you need? There seems to be such a variety of rise curves, in sewing patterns, particularly the back rise, surely they wont all fit your specific figure straight out the packet? Ive read a couple of times on blogs and Instagram about sewers scooping out more from the rise and things like that. WHY are they doing that?! How do they how much to scoop out? Plus, Ive seen some jeans patterns that have a back rise that is not very curved at all, more a diagonal line than a classic J shape. Whats that all about? Is it related to how wide the legs are? Are the rise shapes of skinny-legged jeans and trousers different to the rise shapes of wide-legged trousers? Agh! My mind is close to explosion.


Resourcefulness 

That Coletterie Pant Fitting Cheat Sheet and enclosed links are a nice opener, but they dont really have the depth of explanation or detailed illustrations that Im looking for. The cheat sheet post does recommend three books for further reading: Fitting and Pattern Alteration, Pants for Real People and Perfect Fit: The Classic Guide to Altering Patterns. Do you own any of these, or any other fit/pattern alteration book, and could you recommend it for trousers? Or have you found a particularly useful blog post, YouTube clip or something else that you think could start shedding some light on the baffling world of making well fitting trousers? Enormo-thanks in advance.

Available link for download